Recently, I got the opportunities to explore these platforms, and here is my experience.
Indeed, Moovweb XDN, Netlify, and Vercel belong to the same product category.
They all provide an efficient workflow for frontend development, deployment, maintenance, and analytics.
In this, the Moovweb XDN outperforms for large dynamic sites and its key part is Speed and as it brings the sub-second page load.
It was developed by considering the large applications, especially eCommerce, and brings the JAMstack benefit to large eCommerce sites.
I liked the following aspects of Moovweb XDN:
Sub-second page load
Moovweb XDN is bringing the performance and sub-second page for large sites, which is a game-changer.
Developer friendly workflow
I deployed my few apps on Moovweb XDN, the experience was really great, the workflow defined for executing various operations related to deployment is very well managed.
It is always a challenge for enterprises to migrate from the legacy systems, the incremental migration approach of Moovweb is a boon in this situation.
Predictive Prefetching, brings zero latency to the site.
The XDN Devtools widget helps to understand the behavior of the site i.e. how the site interacts with the XDN, mainly includes, Edge and browser caching, and prefetching.
More details can be found at Moovweb XDN Documentation - Devtools
Performance monitoring by route
We as developers understand routes more efficiently than URL.
The OOTB monitoring tool provided by XDN shows the performance details by the route.
Apart from this,
Build time, performance, and deployment overhead are some common challenges faced when using JAMstack for large enterprise websites, the Moovweb gracefully handles these challenges.
The various pieces of the Moovweb XDN platform can be referred from the answers provided by @howie.ross and @ianand.
So, to conclude if the performance of your site affects your business or you are looking for a sub-second page load, I will strongly recommend to go with Moovweb XDN.